<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If Google ranked your posts on Twitter, would it change how you tweet?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnhaydon.com/2009/06/google-ranked-posts-twitter-change-tweet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnhaydon.com/2009/06/google-ranked-posts-twitter-change-tweet/</link>
	<description>Social media and inbound marketing for non-profits</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:54:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Haydon</title>
		<link>http://www.johnhaydon.com/2009/06/google-ranked-posts-twitter-change-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-2851</link>
		<dc:creator>John Haydon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 01:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnhaydon.com/?p=7652#comment-2851</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Ching!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Ching!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ching Ya</title>
		<link>http://www.johnhaydon.com/2009/06/google-ranked-posts-twitter-change-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-2836</link>
		<dc:creator>Ching Ya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnhaydon.com/?p=7652#comment-2836</guid>
		<description>For the time being? Probably no. Maybe because I don&#039;t put much conversational tweets in public. ^^ It&#039;s just a matter of preference really. Sometimes I publicize, something I rather keep it between me and another. 

If that day ever comes, it MAY trigger a little &#039;interest&#039; of testing out the tweets, but I won&#039;t force myself into it. Good idea about the RT though; I myself don&#039;t retweet much for the already famous RTs; I do think the &#039;less-appreciate&#039; ones with good content, deserve some pat at the back. Just like Google search, sometimes the gems are on pg 10 of SERP. ^^

@wchingya
Social Media/Blogging
.-= Ching Ya&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wchingya/~3/yQaxNvUNkY4/8-features-you-should-know-about-supr.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;8 Features You Should Know About Su.pr&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the time being? Probably no. Maybe because I don&#8217;t put much conversational tweets in public. ^^ It&#8217;s just a matter of preference really. Sometimes I publicize, something I rather keep it between me and another. </p>
<p>If that day ever comes, it MAY trigger a little &#8216;interest&#8217; of testing out the tweets, but I won&#8217;t force myself into it. Good idea about the RT though; I myself don&#8217;t retweet much for the already famous RTs; I do think the &#8216;less-appreciate&#8217; ones with good content, deserve some pat at the back. Just like Google search, sometimes the gems are on pg 10 of SERP. ^^</p>
<p>@wchingya<br />
Social Media/Blogging<br />
.-= Ching Ya&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wchingya/~3/yQaxNvUNkY4/8-features-you-should-know-about-supr.html" rel="nofollow">8 Features You Should Know About Su.pr</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.johnhaydon.com/2009/06/google-ranked-posts-twitter-change-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-2830</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnhaydon.com/?p=7652#comment-2830</guid>
		<description>Agreed. It does seem bizarre if they already include normal tweets but not retweets. It might even improve the quality of the retweet as well, with more thought going into it instead of having 5 usernames and then the link gets cut off because of it... ;-)
.-= Danny Brown&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DannyBrown/~3/hRdbsQTLj5M/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Borders and Walls are Man-Made&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. It does seem bizarre if they already include normal tweets but not retweets. It might even improve the quality of the retweet as well, with more thought going into it instead of having 5 usernames and then the link gets cut off because of it&#8230; <img src='http://www.johnhaydon.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
.-= Danny Brown&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DannyBrown/~3/hRdbsQTLj5M/" rel="nofollow">Borders and Walls are Man-Made</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Haydon</title>
		<link>http://www.johnhaydon.com/2009/06/google-ranked-posts-twitter-change-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-2821</link>
		<dc:creator>John Haydon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnhaydon.com/?p=7652#comment-2821</guid>
		<description>Danny - thanks for adding to the convo!

When I wrote this post, the keywords were in fact a no brainer. But they fit in so naturally with the post, that I didn&#039;t have to put too much thought into them.

I think it&#039;s good if Google did include things like the number of retweets as a ranking factor. Retweets, though they don&#039;t convey authority as much as backlinks do, still serve as a validation of quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danny &#8211; thanks for adding to the convo!</p>
<p>When I wrote this post, the keywords were in fact a no brainer. But they fit in so naturally with the post, that I didn&#8217;t have to put too much thought into them.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s good if Google did include things like the number of retweets as a ranking factor. Retweets, though they don&#8217;t convey authority as much as backlinks do, still serve as a validation of quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.johnhaydon.com/2009/06/google-ranked-posts-twitter-change-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-2814</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 06:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnhaydon.com/?p=7652#comment-2814</guid>
		<description>I think they&#039;re two different entities. You don&#039;t have a conversation on Google (Google Chat excepted) - you use it to try and position yourself above your competitors. Any business that says it doesn&#039;t... well, I don&#039;t think they&#039;re being quite upfront.

With Twitter, while what you say is searchable, it&#039;s still primarily a conversation tool that can be used in a myriad of ways. While businesses and marketers using Twitter purely as a business tool may think more about keywords, the general user won&#039;t bother (or care). 

Just an aside - I have to disagree with both your good self and Mr Brogan about Facebook. It&#039;s another tool in your online arsenal - I don&#039;t think grabbing a relevant URL is as much vanity as common sense. The point Chris made would have been more effective had he just left his URL as a generic number, instead of going for dotchrisbrogan.
[rq=44235,0,blog][/rq]&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DannyBrown/~3/hRdbsQTLj5M/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Borders and Walls are Man-Made&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they&#8217;re two different entities. You don&#8217;t have a conversation on Google (Google Chat excepted) &#8211; you use it to try and position yourself above your competitors. Any business that says it doesn&#8217;t&#8230; well, I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re being quite upfront.</p>
<p>With Twitter, while what you say is searchable, it&#8217;s still primarily a conversation tool that can be used in a myriad of ways. While businesses and marketers using Twitter purely as a business tool may think more about keywords, the general user won&#8217;t bother (or care). </p>
<p>Just an aside &#8211; I have to disagree with both your good self and Mr Brogan about Facebook. It&#8217;s another tool in your online arsenal &#8211; I don&#8217;t think grabbing a relevant URL is as much vanity as common sense. The point Chris made would have been more effective had he just left his URL as a generic number, instead of going for dotchrisbrogan.<br />
[rq=44235,0,blog][/rq]<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DannyBrown/~3/hRdbsQTLj5M/" rel="nofollow">Borders and Walls are Man-Made</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Haydon</title>
		<link>http://www.johnhaydon.com/2009/06/google-ranked-posts-twitter-change-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-2805</link>
		<dc:creator>John Haydon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 01:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnhaydon.com/?p=7652#comment-2805</guid>
		<description>Hildy - good point.

In the end, content that is relevant and useful will win on Google. Call it naive, but I think that, because they have a business to run, they are financially incented to deliver the best content to it&#039;s users.

John
[rq=43673,0,blog][/rq]&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Corporatedollarorg-ExceedYourOn-lineFundraisingGoalsWithSocialMediaMarketing/~3/RZj6YFDda30/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;If Google ranked your posts on Twitter, would it change how you tweet?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hildy &#8211; good point.</p>
<p>In the end, content that is relevant and useful will win on Google. Call it naive, but I think that, because they have a business to run, they are financially incented to deliver the best content to it&#8217;s users.</p>
<p>John<br />
[rq=43673,0,blog][/rq]<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Corporatedollarorg-ExceedYourOn-lineFundraisingGoalsWithSocialMediaMarketing/~3/RZj6YFDda30/" rel="nofollow">If Google ranked your posts on Twitter, would it change how you tweet?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Haydon</title>
		<link>http://www.johnhaydon.com/2009/06/google-ranked-posts-twitter-change-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-2804</link>
		<dc:creator>John Haydon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 01:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnhaydon.com/?p=7652#comment-2804</guid>
		<description>I change the direction of the toilet paper roll on both the 17th and 27th of the month. Just to keep things interesting.
[rq=43672,0,blog][/rq]&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Corporatedollarorg-ExceedYourOn-lineFundraisingGoalsWithSocialMediaMarketing/~3/RZj6YFDda30/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;If Google ranked your posts on Twitter, would it change how you tweet?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I change the direction of the toilet paper roll on both the 17th and 27th of the month. Just to keep things interesting.<br />
[rq=43672,0,blog][/rq]<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Corporatedollarorg-ExceedYourOn-lineFundraisingGoalsWithSocialMediaMarketing/~3/RZj6YFDda30/" rel="nofollow">If Google ranked your posts on Twitter, would it change how you tweet?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Haydon</title>
		<link>http://www.johnhaydon.com/2009/06/google-ranked-posts-twitter-change-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-2803</link>
		<dc:creator>John Haydon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 01:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnhaydon.com/?p=7652#comment-2803</guid>
		<description>Ari,

In truth, keywords did cross my mind when writing the post title, but they were not my primary concern. My primary concern was, &lt;em&gt;&quot;How can I give folks the quickest idea of what this post is about so that they can decide whether to read it or not?&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

Also, because I thought it would be useful to get people&#039;s thoughts on the topic, I wrote the title in the form of a question. 

John
[rq=43657,0,blog][/rq]&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Corporatedollarorg-ExceedYourOn-lineFundraisingGoalsWithSocialMediaMarketing/~3/RZj6YFDda30/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;If Google ranked your posts on Twitter, would it change how you tweet?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ari,</p>
<p>In truth, keywords did cross my mind when writing the post title, but they were not my primary concern. My primary concern was, <em>&#8220;How can I give folks the quickest idea of what this post is about so that they can decide whether to read it or not?&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Also, because I thought it would be useful to get people&#8217;s thoughts on the topic, I wrote the title in the form of a question. </p>
<p>John<br />
[rq=43657,0,blog][/rq]<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Corporatedollarorg-ExceedYourOn-lineFundraisingGoalsWithSocialMediaMarketing/~3/RZj6YFDda30/" rel="nofollow">If Google ranked your posts on Twitter, would it change how you tweet?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hildy Gottlieb</title>
		<link>http://www.johnhaydon.com/2009/06/google-ranked-posts-twitter-change-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-2760</link>
		<dc:creator>Hildy Gottlieb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnhaydon.com/?p=7652#comment-2760</guid>
		<description>As with many of the comments so far, your post made me chuckle to myself. Honestly my first thought was, &quot;Hell, I don&#039;t even consider Google in my website or my blog posts - and Google DOES rank those!&quot;  

The result, BTW, is that many of my articles / posts indeed land in the top 3 on Google (e.g. &quot;founders syndrome&quot;) but that&#039;s not because we aimed at that. It&#039;s because (wait for it) good content rocks! (Duh...)
:-)
[rq=34930,0,blog][/rq]&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CreatingTheFuture/~3/rRuT0Z8ynoE/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Monday Morning Rock Out!&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As with many of the comments so far, your post made me chuckle to myself. Honestly my first thought was, &#8220;Hell, I don&#8217;t even consider Google in my website or my blog posts &#8211; and Google DOES rank those!&#8221;  </p>
<p>The result, BTW, is that many of my articles / posts indeed land in the top 3 on Google (e.g. &#8220;founders syndrome&#8221;) but that&#8217;s not because we aimed at that. It&#8217;s because (wait for it) good content rocks! (Duh&#8230;)<br />
 <img src='http://www.johnhaydon.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
[rq=34930,0,blog][/rq]<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CreatingTheFuture/~3/rRuT0Z8ynoE/" rel="nofollow">Monday Morning Rock Out!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://www.johnhaydon.com/2009/06/google-ranked-posts-twitter-change-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-2758</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnhaydon.com/?p=7652#comment-2758</guid>
		<description>I think you already know my answer, John.  Last I checked I haven&#039;t made many connections by using Google.
[rq=34865,0,blog][/rq]&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.justgabe.com/2009/06/13/three-great-kids/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Three Great Kids&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you already know my answer, John.  Last I checked I haven&#8217;t made many connections by using Google.<br />
[rq=34865,0,blog][/rq]<a href="http://www.justgabe.com/2009/06/13/three-great-kids/" rel="nofollow">Three Great Kids</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
